Site Overlay


The Bush- Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) is a standardised, quantifiable examination of catatonia designed to screen and diagnose. Tab. 1: According to the item Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), here partially modified and partially reported, the severity of catatonia is. PDF | Objective: This article aims to describe the adaptation and translation process of the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) and.

Author: Kajilabar Kekora
Country: Venezuela
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 22 January 2017
Pages: 340
PDF File Size: 4.6 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.72 Mb
ISBN: 326-7-99609-439-6
Downloads: 8454
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akibar

It measures the severity of 23 bksh signs. Scores ranging from 1 to 7 are given on 30 different symptoms in three subscales positive scale 7 items, negative scale 7 items, general psychopathology scale 16 itemswith total score ranging from 30 to Although some critics francos suggested the syndrome is much more uncommon than a century ago or may even be disappearing, catatonia is still highly prevalent 2.

Catatonia is a psychomotor symptom cluster characterized by a heterogeneous group of mental, motor, vegetative, and behavioral signs.

Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS)

The assessments were conducted on the first day of admission in the hospital. It is important to remember that clinicians’ goal is franvis the quest of knowledge itself but the ability to use their available knowledge and skills to prevent and diminish the suffering and disability of their patients.

The catatonia rating scale must detect patients who may exhibit catatonia and identify catatonic signs reliably. Comparison of catatonia presentation in patients with schizophrenia and mood disorders in Lagos, Nigeria.

The Detection and Measurement of Catatonia

First, it lacks uniformity in catatoniia reference definitions as noted in Table 1. Catatonic signs are often regarded as attention-seeking behavior. Catatonia is often neglected when screening and examining psychiatric patients. There is a need to replace these terms with more common and easily understandable terms or to provide concise and clear definitions.


Validity was harder to assess because of the lack of established diagnostic criteria. Perhaps the European catatonia rating scales could provide improved detection, recognition, and measurement of treatment response and provide options for research into catatonia. A Clinician’s Guide to Diagnosis and Treatment. The SAS is used to measure extrapyramidal symptoms.

In the present study, prevalence of catatonia in an acute psychiatric inpatient population was investigated. In this exploratory open label study, we investigated the prevalence of catatonia in an acute psychiatric inpatient population. These results could mostly be explained by the fact that the SUD- and patient-OD groups hardly showed any catatonic symptomatology. The validity of psychiatric diagnosis revisited: Of note, the DSM-5 criteria for catatonia appear to be even more strict than those of its predecessor, even if all 12 items, which were clustered in five categories in the DSM-IV can now be scored separately.

A search for newer treatment approaches to catatonia will require a rating scale that is sensitive to clinical improvement in catatonia without contaminating the rest of psychopathology. Catatonia in an intensive care facility: Cambridge University prEss Failure to identify catatonia may result in increased morbidity and mortality. Barriers to the Validity of Catatonia The terminology used in the diagnostic criteria for catatonic schizophrenia has been a concern and may include 5 to 57 signs.

The modern classification must include catatonia as it occurs on acute and chronic psychiatric units, emergency departments, intensive care units, nursing home settings, catwtonia outpatient clinics. J ECT Materials and Methods Study Design In an exploratory open label cataonia design, each patient admitted to a psychiatric intensive ward during a period of 12 months was assessed for catatonic and clinical symptomatology.


J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Depending on which criteria are being used, the more strict DSM-criteria versus the more liberal criteria suggested by Bush and colleagues i. Stuivenga M and Morrens M Prevalence of the catatonic syndrome in an acute inpatient sample.

Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and empirical treatments for catatonia. Catatonia as a psychomotor movement syndrome: Some patients would still score 3 to 12 points even when clinical improvement has occurred. A home of its own. Psychol Med The review of Caroff and colleagues shows similar results Antidepressants were administered to Support Center Support Center.

The rating scale is accompanied by a standardised examination procedure consisting of nine steps.

Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) – PsychTools

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry While there are several catatonia rating scales, these scales are not routinely taught or included in educational programs as valuable diagnostic instruments.

In an exploratory open label study design, each patient admitted to a psychiatric intensive ward during a period of 12 months was assessed for catatonic and clinical symptomatology.

Major depressive disorder was the main diagnosis in six patients 4. Clear and unambiguous descriptions of terms were as follows: There are reasons to believe that the profile of catatonic symptomatology may depend on the underlying pathology 15 Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia. Journal List Psychiatry Edgmont v.

Frontiers | Prevalence of the Catatonic Syndrome in an Acute Inpatient Sample | Psychiatry

Prevalence and clinical significance of catatonic symptoms in mania. Future research is needed to determine diagnostical criteria of catatonia, which are clinically relevant.

Distribution of catatonic signs.