Site Overlay


Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.

Author: Faunos Kajill
Country: Lithuania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 8 November 2018
Pages: 166
PDF File Size: 18.86 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.84 Mb
ISBN: 778-7-36367-511-8
Downloads: 97068
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Daik

Allah, in the name of, the Most Affectionate, the Eternally Merciful. Questions are good for your intellectual health!!! Search the Website New. New articles and books are added this website on 1 st of each month. Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments.

Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani |

They will be highly appreciated. Send at mubashirnazir gmail. Because I am the student of history and I know what the Amir Muawia did in his 20 years rule. And then he tried to convert the muslim khilafat into malookiat.

And he did so and the muawiyw was in the form of ” Waqia Karbala”.

Bad Blood :: Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Pdf Download

This is the history and it cant be denied. My point is that if you want to quote an example it should be a good example. Because in this way you can say that Zia- ul-Haq ruled for 11 years because he was a very patient person. Musharrif ruled for 9 years because he is very patient. The length of ruling period is not a sign of patients. I hope you get my point.

I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’. But the truth is truth. Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah. Many thanks for your kind words and comments about my books.

If we accept the narrations portraying himself as a dictator, the matter will not remain limited to him. It is completely wrong to compare him with culprits like Zia or Musharaf. I appreciate that you study the history. There is a discipline in the historical studies that deals with criticism on historical events.

Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate the authenticity of the events reported by the history. We should not accept all incidents reported to us by historians without such evaluation. It is very logical. If someone blames our father, should we accept his accusations without any assessment?

Similarly, Banu A’bbas did the same to defame the Ummayyads. The approach of Tabari was to compile all the narrations whether authentic or not in a chronological order.

He only compiled the traditions and did not perform evaluation of such reports. Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake. If you know Arabic, you should study the history from its original source. All other history books of subsequent periods were written based on Tabari’s work. Large number of narrators who reported the incidents related to the civil wars of companion’s time were biased against the companions.

You can take each narration one by one and see the biographies of their narrators compiled by the scholars of Hadith. It is completely wrong to consider Hazrat Mu’awiya as the person who transformed Khilafat into Malukiyat.


Since you’ve mentioned that you are not a ShiaI’ll urge you to study it with an open mind and analyze its content critically. The book is available at the following links: Thank you very much for answering me. I read the book thoroughly but I am sorry instead of making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful. I respect the author of this book but it seems like he is just playing with the words.

A riwaiat is not authentic because the rawi is shia and the same time another riwaiat by a shia rawi is authentic because it favours his opinion I hope you got my point of view. Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah.

The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work. I’m not in a position to do so.

My objective of providing you with the book was to demonstrate that two points of view exist on this issue and both groups have their own arguments based on the reports compiled by Imam Tabari. Rest of the books are written on the basis of his compilation.

Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad Saqib Risalpuri

If you study the history of Tabari for such years, you’ll find people in the Sanad of all negative reports about the companions. Tabari is available on the following link. You can download and see through the chapters related amrer the years ranging from 30 to 65H. As far tareemhi I’ve studied the history, I’ve reached at the conclusion that it is not possible to settle a disputed issue based on a historical reports.

Even we cannot reach at a decisive conclusion about events happening in our life. Tzreekhi, facts related to assassination of Bin Laden are also disputed. Only that haqakq will reach at a real conclusion who was present at that occasion and bears eyewitness of an incident. Other than that, there is nothing except theories of different people.

You know that a theory means, “it might have happened “. We cannot say about a theory that “it definitely has happened. I’ll sincerely advise you to leave this matter to Allah. He will decide this issue muawkya the Day of Judgment. When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them. If the answer is yes, we should go for it but if the answer is no, why to conduct a debate on an issue that has not been settled during last 14 centuries. On the other side, if we keep a bad opinion about the companions and they were free from such accusations, Allah will definitely hold us accountable.

Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias tareekkhi Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa. We should keep a good view Husn Zann about all the companions and leave the matter of their internal disputes of Allah.

We should consider the following facts about these issues: If someone portrays a bad picture of any respected person for you e. There is no doubt that the incident of Karbala is a grave incident of our history.

But the issue is that we do not have reliable and undisputed information about such incidents. The unchallenged information could only be the one which is available to us by ” Tawatur please see the link below ” which is not sufficient to give us a complete picture of the incident. If a matter with such doubtful information is presented to any court in the world, the judge will not be able to decide the matter and will acquit the suspect based on the benefit of doubt despite of the fact that the suspect and relevant witnesses are available in his court.


Why should we not do so in this case and leave the matter to Allah for such people who passed away a long time before us and we do not have reliable information available to put a charge against them. We know that some people are biased towards Hazrat Abu BakrU’mar. So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities?

We also know that all such people disguised themselves in mainstream Muslims. In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious. I agree with you that narrations from such people should not be accepted in other matters even it is in favor of our view.

All those who accepted their caliphate will also be charged automatically as they accepted corrupt rulers. Therefore, the issue becomes extremely grave. Nobody believes that Sahaba were free from sin. Although mistakes at individual capacity was possible but how could you believe that all companions committed a great crime collectively while the evidence against them is nothing except statements of a few people whose reliability is already under question?

You can check by yourselves in the “History of Tabari ” that all reports portraying a sleazy picture of the companions are reported by only five persons and all of them are considered as “liars “.

I repeat the names: Nobody engages in a revolt with a handful of companions including his family members and young children. Therefore, there is no charge of revolt against him. It is also reported in some narrations that he changed his decision once he found that a rule has already been established there. Although we are not sure about authenticity of such reports. Mohadisin have devised a great procedure to evaluate authenticity of Hadith.

The same procedure could be applied to historical reports as well.

I’ll advise you to study that procedure and apply that on the original source of all historical narrations compiled by Tabari. Why should we rely on secondary sources?

If the matter is disturbing you, conduct your own research in the light of above-mentioned procedure. Details of this procedure are available here: Please see at least the Unit 1 of this book. When I conducted such research, I found that almost all reports containing negative information about such companions was reported by one or more of the five narrators mentioned above.

But I’ll advise you to not rely on me and conduct your own study. If the matter is not much disturbing, I’ll urge you to leave the matter to Allah. We are free to form opinions within this life.